You are viewing genrereviews

 
 
14 February 2009 @ 11:10 am
Kiss Me Kill Me by Lauren Henderson  
Publisher: Delacorte Press 2008
Genre: Mystery
Sub-genre: YA
Rating: 2 pints of blood PhotobucketPhotobucket



I confess: the juxtaposition of the light, bright purity and innocence of the picture (I don't know if you can see it but he has the tiniest tiniest amount of bum fluff on his chin) with the killer (haha) title caught my eye, but the main reason I wanted to read it was because I mistook it for a paranormal book.

Was the blurb misleading or did I just see what I wanted to see? The intriguing premise reminded me of Rogue from the X-Men, so perhaps that's why I assumed it was a paranormal story.

Imagine my disappointment then to find it's a mystery story! Especially considering I don't like mysteries or read many of them, with very few exceptions. They always tend to feel too contrived and character development falls by the wayside for the sake of the oh-so-clever plot that isn't all that clever. Well, I'll come back to that. On with the review...

Scarlett Wakefield is a dag among peacocks at the elite, private girls' school of St. Tabby's in London, making no effort with her appearance, putting her energy into gymnastics with her two friends Luce and Alison rather than shopping sprees and posing. Yet she wants to be a part of it all and hang out with the popular boys from the posh boys' school - especially Dan. So when Nadia Farouk, second-in-command to the princess of the school, Plum Saybourne, invites Scarlett - and only Scarlett - to sit with them by the fountain she jumps at the chance and leaves her friends behind.

Next thing she knows, she's been invited to Nadia's select party at her parents' penthouse apartment, at Plum's insistence. The chemistry is definitely there between her and Dan, and before you can say "teenage hormones" they're going in for a big intimate kiss - until Dan asphyxiates and dies in her arms and Plum's screaming that Scarlett killed him.

How did Dan die? Did Scarlett really kill him? Who left her a note saying it wasn't her fault, and what does this person know that Scarlett doesn't?


It took me far too long to read this light YA book with it's easy 260 pages, but I made it - only to discover that the story doesn't wrap up but continues in a sequel called Kisses and Lies. I'd be curious to know who's idea that was, because there seems no reason to split the story into two separate books except to make more money off unsuspecting teenagers.

It's not that there are any glaring problems with this book - there are lots of small ones. Scarlett is a pretty unexceptional protagonist, good at gymnastics and fun when she goes into spying mode, but reads like a carbon-copy teenager with a trust fund. Her biggest moral dilemma is her betrayal of Luce and Alison, who won't talk to her, but she's still the victim here. I never really came to like her.

It's also a very slow book. Nothing really happens until the last few chapters when Scarlett and her new friend, butch American girl Taylor, start their investigation - and even then, it's pretty quiet. Speaking of Taylor: Kiss Me Kill Me, while set in England, has a rather bizarre mix of British and US spelling and vocabulary that was rather distracting.

This is Henderson's first Young Adult novel; she previously wrote adult mysteries she calls "tart noir" and a nonfiction book called Jane Austen's Guide to Dating which I believe has been optioned for a movie. This isn't a bad YA book for a first try (ouch) but it does read like Henderson's still getting the feel for teenage characters and she's not really sure of herself yet.

There were many opportunities for some wise insights into certain aspects of teenage culture, British upper-class culture etc., but she shys away from all of them, leaving a sadly superfluous story featuring terribly superficial, stereotypical characters. It's also the kind of book where you can easily skip over whole paragraphs and not lose any of the story - just some of Scarlett's repetitive thought processes.

To top it off, the mystery's not terribly mysterious. I hope the sequel is more gripping than this, but I doubt I'll read it - not even to find out who "dunnit" or why. The only reason I'm not giving this just one pint of blood is because I feel like I've been mean enough already.
 
 
( Read 8 commentsLeave a comment )
Anna_ocelott_ on February 14th, 2009 07:00 pm (UTC)
Ha! I actually have Jane Austen's Guide to Dating. My mom gave it to me, and my husband kind of went "...uhhhh..."

Seriously, though, she just thought it was something I'd get a kick out of, since she knows I'm an Austen fan. It was a fun read. I had no idea she wrote fiction!
Shannonaurillia on February 14th, 2009 07:49 pm (UTC)
Did it actually have anything to do with Jane Austen?
Anna_ocelott_ on February 18th, 2009 07:18 pm (UTC)
It did, actually! She uses examples from the books (passages and all) to demonstrate things to do and not to do in romance, stuff like pointing out how Miss Bingley's attempts at vicious gossip with Mr Darcy always backfired, or how Jane Bennett almost lost her man simply because she never let him think she liked him. It was cute, if fluffy.
Shannonaurillia on February 21st, 2009 08:24 pm (UTC)
Guess that's part of what makes it timeless - these things never change!